Problem 464 - compton scattering angular distribution of polarized photon
Summary: compton scattering angular distribution of polarized photon
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of problem 578
Alias: None
Product: Geant4
Classification: Unclassified
Component: processes/electromagnetic/lowenergy (show other problems)
Version: 4.0
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Assignee: longof
URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mizuno/...
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-02-27 19:12 CET by mizuno
Modified: 2004-02-18 01:31 CET (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this problem.
Description mizuno 2003-02-27 19:12:01 CET
We have construct a detector simulator for polarized X-ray detector and found a
possible minor bug in low energy physics process. We have constructed plastic
scintillator slab of 20cm thickness and shot 100keV X-rays whose polarization
vector is (1, 0, 0) along z-axis. We saw azimuth angle asymmetry for the first
compton scattered photons (that is good), but couldn't see any asymmetry for
the second or latter ones. We appreciate if you could examine this issue. For
reference, you can get two figures from
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~mizuno/G4Polarimeter/. The one (p1.gif) is the
azimuth angle dependence of the first scattered photons, and the other (p2.gif)
for the second scattered photons. We are using Geant4 4.0 with patch2.
Comment 1 pia 2003-02-28 00:22:59 CET
Thanks for your information. The problem report is reassigned to the author of
the G4LowEnergyPolarizedCompton class, who will contact you as soon as possible
with further information.
Best regrads,
Maria Grazia Pia
Comment 2 francesco.longo 2003-05-27 10:45:59 CEST
We tested the angular distribution of a double compton event both using a simple
unit test and a full detector simulation and found that the double compton
azimuthal distribution for a lineraly polarized incident photon is well reproduced.
F.Longo and G.Depaola
Comment 3 francesco.longo 2003-05-27 11:15:59 CEST
Some other tests are required to solve the bug. F.Longo and G.Depaola
Comment 4 Gabriele Cosmo 2004-02-18 01:31:59 CET
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 578 ***
*** 'longof@ts.infn.it' will be responsible for this bug. ***