In the evaluation of the containment efficiency for DBD0nu events in TeO2 crystals I defined the material both as TeO2 and O2Te. I used PhysicsList.cc of examples/extended/electromagnetic/TestEM9 and I have switched between G4EmStandard, G4EmLivermore, G4EmPenelope and PhysListEmStandard. The results I obtain are: PhysListEMStandard TeO2 87.76 +/- 0.13 % O2Te 86.14 +/- 0.13 % G4EmStandard TeO2 87.76 +/- 0.13 % O2Te 86.21 +/- 0.13 % G4Livermore TeO2 88.49 +/- 0.13 % O2Te 88.46 +/- 0.13 % G4Penelope TeO2 88.77 +/- 0.13 % O2Te 88.85 +/- 0.13 % The efficiencies obtained with PhysListEMStandard and G4EmStandard change depending on the order of definition of the elements in the material but if I substitute in PhysListEMStandard the eBrem model (used below 1 GeV) with LowEnBrem (below 1 GeV) I obtain results compatible with G4Livermore: TeO2 88.45 +/- 0.13 % O2Te 88.42 +/- 0.13 % so the problem seems to be in the eBrem model.
Hello, Thanks for the report, Please, send tar file with your application. If you are using TestEm9, please, inform what version of G4 and send your macro-file. Vladimir
Hello, The problem is fixed. The fix will be available in the next public version of Geant4 (June 2010). VI