| Summary: | creation of excited states | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Geant4 | Reporter: | michel.maire |
| Component: | processes/hadronic | Assignee: | Vladimir.Ivantchenko |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | Alberto.Ribon, michel.maire |
| Priority: | P4 | ||
| Version: | other | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Attachments: |
macro for Hadr03
printout for QGSP_BIC printout for AllHP |
||
Created attachment 845 [details]
printout for QGSP_BIC
Created attachment 846 [details]
printout for AllHP
Hi Michel, thanks for this bug report! It was a real problem in the updated FermiBreakUp model. Currently, the fix is merged to the master. Please, try it out. Cheers, Vladimir BinaryCascade is ok in ref-01 No change for AllHP Cheers, Michel Hi Michel, I take current master (nearly ref-01) and Hadr03 provides for QGSP_BIC_HP and QGSP_BIC_AllHP statistically the same results. I would not expect the difference, because the test is done for 1 MeV neutron beam. To me the problem is fixed. Vladimir For neutron incident, there had never differences between BIC_HP and BIC_AllHP ... the problem is for proton or alpha incident : BIC versus AllHP |
Created attachment 844 [details] macro for Hadr03 here, a macro for Hadr03: proton, 20 MeV, on O18 (from User forum). The result for two physics constructors : QGSP_BIC and AllHP. With QGSP_BIC, I do not understand the meaning of the N15 excited states. With AllHP ... no comment !!!